Tin wrote:


Thats what made Starcraft so popular in the first place, well balanced and fun.
I guess I just need some more time and teammembers with patiance while I learn how to not turtle

Johannicus wrote:


Im a turtler to on c&c so im sure ill be the same on SC2 if / when i get it

Turtler works good in singleplayer but not in multiplayer, especially against a human opponent. Atleast not a building based turtle. Unit wise it might work.

VoGon wrote:


Total Annihilation. Nuff said.

turltling is for little girls xD
(i suck tbh)
brb, getting new comp and reinstalling windows

dynamicaL wrote:


No, those who complain about a tactic are bad gamers. Those who win by using a good tactic are good gamers. Camping, turtleing etc are good tactics, its those that usualy die by said tactic that complain.

Greenie wrote:


SC+BW are one of the all time best RTS out there!

Johannicus wrote:

ah, you took me way too seriously
But for the sake of argument; what about those who complain about how [some tactic that works in other games] doesnt work instead of adopting one that does?

dynamicaL wrote:


haha, no I just saw the oppertunity to say what I thought. Hence why I brought up camping. Camping has saved my life many times so I dont care if ppl complain about me doing it.

Those who complain and doesnt adapt to the game usualy stops playing. I say stop wining or stop playing. Im currently reworking a strategy in SC2. But I do have to say on the subject that I miss the old RTS games that toke 1-2 hours sometimes because of the epic battles. I dont want all RTS games to turn into fast paced matches. For example, I havnt seen a single nuclear launch in SC2 multiplayer wich you usualy saw a couple of in SC and BW.

For those of you that dont have the collectors edition but wondered what it exactly contained or how it looks.

[youtube:29se71k0][/youtube:29se71k0]