Ok Guys, This is bugging me so much, but first To be able to answer this perfectly your goining to need to have:
-Played A Medium Spec Game, Counter Strike:Source is a good example
-Played a High Spec Game, Call Of Duty 4-5 are the best examples
-Have Knowledge of FPS Games.
Well this is it. Between me and my dad have bought nearly all High Spec Games that have gotten a 85+ rating i would say, and yet the graphics are amazing and the gameplay looks fantastic, i feel that they lack the fun of a game like Counter Strike. Yeah I'm guessing Counter Strike was a High Spec FPS in its day of release but still i feel that Counter Strike is alot more fun than my second favourite game Call of Duty:World At War.
I'm guessing this is not just me or Counter Strike wouldnt still be played on, much
. THen there's the fact that Call of duty spend millions and millions on their games, yet counter strike is still more over played. So Which is Better High Spec FPS's with there fantastic looks, Or Medium Spec FPS's with there more fun gamging.
This is What i say
HIGH FPS
Pro's
Better Graphics
More Stuff in Game
Tends to have more weapons
More Up-to-date, i.e Patches.
Con's
Only good systems can play
Too Complex
When can i get the time to play?
Cost's a lot
MEDIUM FPS
Pro'sCon's
Can get boring with less things
Less Updates
Can look like a 6 year old has made
Tend to get annoying Kids online
(There's Proberly More)
Ok So i want you to give me new Pro's and Con's to each of these, ill put them together along with a poll and see by the end of the month which is better. Thanks for Your Time.
~EvilSaint